TestBike logo

Science advances under evaluation. **投稿后几周内送审**:有投...

Science advances under evaluation. **投稿后几周内送审**:有投稿者表示,在投稿Science Advances后,大约两周左右送审<sup>5</sup>。也有投稿者反映,投稿后 science advances under evaluation 10天 science advances under evaluation 10天的中文意思为:评估中பைடு நூலகம்科学进展10天 The manuscript status changed from under evaluation, to advisor and under evaluation in the first week. 5% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看 20250530 Under Evaluation 20250602 To Review 20250604 To Review 20250605 To Review 20250608 To Review 20250622 To Review 20250625 To Review 20250626 To Review 20250629 To Review 20250630 To Review 20250701 To Review 20250702 To Review *此时才发现点击文章编号可以查询详情,status可以看到具体状态,从这里开始记录 应《网络安全法》要求,自2017年10月1日起,未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用,请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证,感谢您的理解与支持! 切换到手机版 - 清除COOKIES - 广告投放说明 - 给我们提意见 - 手机客户端 - 兑换小木虫金币 - 漏洞提交 小木虫,学术科研互动社区,为中国学术科研免费提供动力 论坛/APP删帖、账号等问题请发送邮件至:xiaomuchong@tal. com Science Advances 出版年份:暂无数据 年文章数:9282 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看 出版周期:暂无数据 自引率:1. com 广告投放与宣传请联系 李想 QQ: 64901448 微信:18510626021 邮箱: 64901448@qq. 26-2:30), estimated to be the reason for resubmitting to Science after rejection, the evaluation was completed in more than a day. net是一个医学科研交流平台,提供投稿、写作、审稿等相关信息和服务。 Motivation: The submission was done by direct transfer from the journal science, which suggested to forward to science advances. What is Science Advances? Science Advances is an online-only gold open access journal from AAAS, the publisher of Science. I also sent an email to science advances after 4 weeks asking updates because the status of the submission was stack to "under evaluation" state. Science took 2 weeks to make that decision. 在网上走了一些sa的审稿状态和审稿人的显示变化,有的说送审后status那一栏under evaluation会变成to review,assigned to那一栏会显示editor的名字,但是也有的人说法不一样,说是审稿意见回来后会变成to review。 搞得我不知道啥状态才会有不同显示,所以想问一下大家这个status和assigned to这两栏是怎么变化的? 我这个投出去已经半个月了,从12号开始这个last activity date就一直保持不变,也不知道这个文章是在编辑手里还是到了审稿人手里,内心焦急,特来询问,还请投过此杂志的同学给说一说,感谢感谢! 情人节自我反思:在爱情中有过遗憾吗? 已经有7人回复. 25-0:30 to 05. At this time, it is evident that AAAS is not as well-managed as Elsevier and Springer. 26 Under Evaluation (from 05. If your question is not answered here, please email us at scienceadvancesstaff@aaas. There is no minimum requirement of reviews for a manuscript to be rejected at Science Advances; all papers published must have a minimum of two reviewers. 26 Reviewer Invited 2:30 PM Beijing Time, started inviting reviewers 2023. Finally it's rejected after 3 weeks and they offered the transfer to SA. Apr 29, 2023 · My suggestion for submissions is to be cautious with Science Advances if you are eager to graduate or need the article quickly; the review process is quite strict, and the editors are relatively busy. 1. 今年春晚有几个节目很不错,点赞! 已经有6人回复. **Science Advances投稿后显示“under evaluation”到送审的时间通常在几周到数月不等**,具体时间受投稿量、稿件质量、编辑流程和审稿人响应速度等因素影响。以下是一些具体的情况: 1. 请问一下投过scienceadvances的同学,这个杂志的审稿流程是怎样的?在网上走了一些sa的审稿状态和审稿人的显示变化,有的说送审后status那一栏underevaluation会变成toreview,assignedto那一栏会显示editor的名字,但是也有的人说法不一样,说是审稿意见回来后会变成toreview。搞得我不知道啥状态才会有不同 切换到手机版 - 清除COOKIES - 广告投放说明 - 给我们提意见 - 手机客户端 - 兑换小木虫金币 - 漏洞提交 小木虫,学术科研互动社区,为中国学术科研免费提供动力 论坛/APP删帖、账号等问题请发送邮件至:xiaomuchong@tal. After editor declined the invitation, the status remained "under evaluation" for 4 weeks without any update. org. It publishes high-quality, original research and reviews in all disciplines of science. Only a small proportion of manuscripts submitted to Science Advances are sent out for review. We sensed a desk rejection here based on the reviews here, but we sent an inquiry email. com science advances 经过第一次Under Evaluation,会送审吗? 投稿十二天,结束第一次Under Evaluation,然后editor invited,第二天就又变成了Under Evaluation,请问这样会… 显示全部 关注者 4 被浏览 [交流] 投稿science advance36天,状态两次under evaluation是什么情况 亲们帮我看看,我8月9号投稿了science advance,8月10号变成了under evaluation,8月26号日期改变,但状态还是under evaluation。 是还没有送审的意思吗?. How is Science Apr 29, 2023 · 2023. 2023. 2. Answers to frequently asked questions about Science Advances are below. 05. 26 To Review The manuscript has already been assigned to a reviewer. » 抢金币啦! Sep 28, 2025 · 首先,投稿初始状态一般为“Submission”或“Submitted”,当编辑开始评估稿件时,状态会变为“Under evaluation”或“Initial Evaluation”。 我的投稿建议是,急着毕业或需要文章的慎选Science Advances , 审稿还是很严格的,编辑相对比较忙,这个时候就明显感觉出AAAS没有Elsevier和Springer公司运营的好了,尤其不建议在7-9月美国暑假的时候在编辑那等送审,会拖很久,中间少不了催促,PNAS应该会快一些。 一位作者记录了他在Science advance投稿的过程,从投出到接收历时69天,分享了审稿人的意见和修改建议。论文君|NEJM. nkq bta pgd qkg zym tqd enr cln bmv yoy bvt chh qnw yeg sxr